Re: [exim] sender callout mail_from change

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Magnus Holmgren
Date:  
À: exim-users
Sujet: Re: [exim] sender callout mail_from change
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 10:43, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
> you might hit a server that doesn't use cached results;
> there might be machines that do sender verification with
> random return paths or something else mad (probably rare).
> if you use a null return-path then these cases can't
> happen because there is nowhere the remote side can make a
> verification callout to. in practice it may well usually
> be safe to use non-null senders.


I thought we already established that you should yourself use a special return
path address for callout verification, and not perform any callout
verification when someone addresses it. Or you could always perform callout
verification at or after DATA.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        holmgren@???
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)


"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans