50 minutes later it has 5 running and its working great =)
Magnus Holmgren-3 wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 21:38, altendew wrote:
>> My mail queue currently says..
>>
>> "There are currently 7722 messages in the mail queue."
>>
>> These arnt spam they are just unsent messages. Is there any option in
>> Exim
>> to make it send these out faster, my server can handle a bigger load.
>> Does
>> exim send one out at a time, or does it have multiple spools?
>
> Exim by default makes a delivery attempt right away after receipt. If
> several
> messages were received over the same connection, all are delivered in
> parallel. Queue runners, however, deliver one message at a time, but if
> the
> same message has many recipients, they are delivered to in parallel, up to
> the limit set by remote_max_parallel. If one queue runner isn't done going
> through the queue by the time it's time to start the next, there can be
> many
> queue runners working at the same time, up to the limit set by
> queue_run_max.
>
> So, you can do the following:
>
> * Start queue runners more often (the interval is set with the -q<time>
> command line option; see chapter 5 of the Exim specification).
> * Increase queue_run_max or even set it to 0 (meaning unlimited).
> * Increase remote_max_parallel (if messages have more than two
> recipients).
>
> Watch out so that resource usage doesn't go overboard.
>
> --
> Magnus Holmgren holmgren@???
> (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
>
> "Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
> Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Send-Mass-E-mails-Quicker-tf3084435.html#a8585828
Sent from the Exim Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
