Marc Sherman <msherman@???> (Fr 08 Dez 2006 14:53:38 CET):
>
> This has been discussed ad nauseam many times in the past. It will _not_
> give you a reliable mail server even if implemented. A large number of
> sites do not reject blacklisted messages with 550's, but rather
> quarantine or blackhole them. So implementing this feature will have all
> the negatives of violating the RFCs, and none of the intended benefits.
>
> http://www.google.ca/search?q=site:www.exim.org/mail-archives+fallback+OR+retry+smarthost&hl=en&lr=&start=10&sa=N
Ok. Thank you. I'll read it and then restart the discussion ;-)
Best regards from Dresden
Viele Grüße aus Dresden
Heiko Schlittermann
--
SCHLITTERMANN.de ---------------------------- internet & unix support -
Heiko Schlittermann HS12-RIPE -----------------------------------------
gnupg encrypted messages are welcome - key ID: 48D0359B ---------------
gnupg fingerprint: 3061 CFBF 2D88 F034 E8D2 7E92 EE4E AC98 48D0 359B -
