Auteur: Ian Eiloart Date: À: Chris Lightfoot, Renaud Allard CC: David Saez Padros, exim users Sujet: Re: [exim] UCEPROTECT Blacklists and why callouts are abusive
--On 18 October 2006 09:53:10 +0100 Chris Lightfoot <chris@???>
wrote:
>
>>
>> Indeed, but, as mentioned before, some will argue that if the spf is
>> false you have no right to use their resources to verify things as it is
>> probably a spam. And if spf != pass && spf != false (IE: not defined)
>
> This is a misconception. the fact that, say, a large ISP
> publishes SPF records for some set of machines does not
> mean that their customers may not send mail via other
> servers. If I pay, say, AOL cash money for an AOL email
> address, I'm entitled to use it however I like;
Except in violation of their terms of use. Presumably that means that you
can't use it in violation of their SPF policy.
