Re: [exim] What's up ith the uceprotect blacklist?

Marc Perkel wrote:

>
> Bill Hacker wrote:
>
>>Marc Perkel wrote:
>>
>>Hopefully you are 'weighting' the result (we did...), as an all/nothing test
>>will otherwise create more than a few FP's, even if adjusted for time delays.
>>
>>Bill
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> What I'm doing is making sure the verification gives me a solid error
> after the rcpt-to: and not before. All other failures don't count
> against the message. And I have a noverify list for badly configured
> servers.
>

Well, let's have a look.

Sending you a copy of this 'directly' as well, and betting that it fails sender
verification.

Bill