John Robinson wrote:
> On 22/09/2006 00:00, Steve Sobol wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, John Robinson wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, it's possible, and it's not too hard, but with the config change I
>>>suggested before you wouldn't need to.
>>
>>
>>
>>>You sound as if you'd rather not change your config at all, but Exim's
>>>relatively easy to configure, so why not?
>>
>>Because, I quote:
>>
>>"Well, you could just
>> deny domains = those_domains
>> !hosts = +allowed_hosts
>>
>>but if I understand correctly, that would also stop accepting mail for
>>those_domains from any relay_from_hosts or authenticated users, which
>>may not be the desired effect."
>>
>>Yes, I need to accept connections from authenticated users.
>
>
> Sorry, I meant my earlier suggestions, in my 8:26pm message:
> http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060918/msg00085.html
>
> The idea there didn't suffer from the same problems.
>
> [...]
>
>>I can tell there's stuff being sent directly to Exim;
>
> [...]
>
> OK, fair enough, sounds like you really do need this, but it wouldn't
> always be necessary, and perhaps it probably won't in another couple of
> weeks once the last remnants of DNS cacheing settle down and go away.
>
> Cheers,
>
> John.
>
Wish a 'coule of weeks' woudl do.
Some of the vermin hard-wire stuff in place and/or chase 'A' records.
I've had a few that chase domains gone out of any public mx records 2 and 3
*years* ago, or that never had an mx record in the first instance.
Bill
