Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@???> writes:
> On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 11:00 +0200, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>> headers_remove = ...:X-Spam-Status:...:X-836-Spam-Status:...
>> headers_add = X-Spam-Status: $h_x-836-spam-status
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if there were bugs related to referencing a
> removed header. (Philip may want to check this in due course :-)
>
> use an ACL variable instead of the temporary X-836 header, IMHO that's a
> cleaner solution, anyway.
Hmm, but now I get different problems. With
warn set acl_m0 = Yes ($spam_score points)
>------- spam = nobody:true/defer_ok
>------- condition = ${if >={$spam_score_int}{50}{1}{0}}
warn set acl_m0 = No ($spam_score points)
>------- spam = nobody:true/defer_ok
>------- condition = ${if <{$spam_score_int}{50}{1}{0}}
I get mails containing
X-Spam-Status: No (8.8 points)
How's that possible?
Thanks,
--Nikolaus
--
A: Weil es die Lesbarkeit des Textes verschlechtert.
Q: Warum ist TOFU so schlimm?
A: TOFU
F: Was ist das groesste Aergerniss in eMail und Usenet?
