On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
> Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > Boggle! How do you expect a thread-aware MUA to deal with your
> > messages sensibly when they have no thread information at all? Let
> > alone "less" thread-aware MUAs.
>
> As in the screenshot: http://conducive.org/threading.tiff
There's no threading there. That's just sorting by subject with some bogus
scaffolding on the left-hand-side. Note that you don't have more than one
level of nesting, as (for example) the pipermail archive does.
See how Pine shows it, with nesting:
http://dotat.at/graphics/pine.png
In particular see how the "ACL to reject spam" and MailScanner threads
have a structure that your screenshot doesn't show, and how the structure
of various threads has been flattened by your replies.
> And, again, will someone kindly tell me what headers leave alone so as
> to help *others*?
You have been told several times.
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00114.html
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00121.html
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00125.html
RFC 2822 section 3.6.4.
References and In-Reply-To.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
%20the%20pipermail%20archive%20does.%0A>%20See%20how%20Pine%20shows%20it,%20with%20nesting:%20http://dotat.at/graphics/pine.png%0A>%20In%20particular%20see%20how%20the%20%22ACL%20to%20reject%20spam%22%20and%20MailScanner%20threads%0A>%20have%20a%20structure%20that%20your%20screenshot%20doesn't%20show,%20and%20how%20the%20structure%0A>%20of%20various%20threads%20has%20been%20flattened%20by%20your%20replies.%0A>%20%0A>%20>%20And,%20again,%20will%20someone%20kindly%20tell%20me%20what%20headers%20leave%20alone%20so%20as%0A>%20>%20to%20help%20*others*?%0A>%20%0A>%20You%20have%20been%20told%20several%20times.%0A>%20%0A>%20http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00114.html%0A>%20http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00121.html%0A>%20http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20060710/msg00125.html%0A>%20%0A>%20RFC%202822%20section%203.6.4.%0A>%20%0A>%20References%20and%20In-Reply-To.%0A>%20%0A>%20Tony.%0A>%20--%20%0A>%20<fanf@???>%20%20%20<dot@???>%20%20%20http://dotat.at/%20%20%20%24%7Bsg%7B%5CN%24%7Bsg%7B%5C%0A>%20N%5C%7D%7B(%5B%5EN%5D*)(.)(.)(.*)%7D%7B%5C%241%5C%243%5C%242%5C%241%5C%243%5Cn%5C%242%5C%243%5C%244%5C%243%5Cn%5C%243%5C%242%5C%244%7D%7D%5C%0A>%20%5CN%7D%7B(%5B%5EN%5D*)(.)(.)(.*)%7D%7B%5C%241%5C%243%5C%242%5C%241%5C%243%5Cn%5C%242%5C%243%5C%244%5C%243%5Cn%5C%243%5C%242%5C%244%7D%7D%0A>%20%0A>%20%0A>%20 "Válasz az üzenetre")
