Re: [exim] sender verify and greylisting

Tony Finch wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
>
>> From inspection of the archive, I think I see the sort of problem it is
>>causing for those with less thread-aware MUA's, and am happy to fix
>>that.
>
>
> Boggle! How do you expect a thread-aware MUA to deal with your messages
> sensibly when they have no thread information at all? Let alone "less"
> thread-aware MUAs.
>
> Tony.

As in the screenshot:

http://conducive.org/threading.tiff

Where's the beef?

And, again, will someone kindly tell me what headers leave alone so as to help
*others*?

Bill