On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 06:35:38PM +0800, W B Hacker said:
> Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > References-based threading is not the same as sorting messages by subject.
>
> I don't sort by subject unless looking for something like last year's license
> key, but never mind.
>
> From inspection of the archive, I think I see the sort of problem it is causing
> for those with less thread-aware MUA's, and am happy to fix that.
>
> So - which ONE (or TWO?) of the rather large number of sesame's extraneous
> X-Headers should I issue a pass for in the router/transport sets these hit?
>
> (archive deliveries, inbound and outbound, preserve them all, but on-box and
> remote smtp deliveries strip them)
Why are you stripping In-Reply-To and References and so forth anyway? I
can't immediately imagine a reason for doing it.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Stephen Gran | BOFH excuse #257: That would be |
| steve@??? | because the software doesn't work. |
| http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
