[exim] This list is not abusive. (Re: Why is this list so ab…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: listrcv
Date:  
To: David Woodhouse
CC: exim users, Jason Meers, Peter Bowyer
Old-Topics: Re: [exim] Why is this list so abusive?
Subject: [exim] This list is not abusive. (Re: Why is this list so abusive?)
David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 17:08 +0100, Jason Meers wrote:
>
>>Question?
>>
>>Are we saying that providing a reference (with or without the F word) is
>>preferred over providing a more detailed answer because it's
>>counter-productive and doesn't "teach a man to fish"?
>
>
> Yes. The issue of the F word is irrelevant. I'm not sure about your
> culture but the first book of the Bible makes it entirely clear that to
> be ashamed of nakedness and natural bodily functions is a sign of sin.
> Thus, if you're offended by what you so quaintly call the 'F word' then
> you will surely burn in hell :)


So reading documentations is a sign of sin?

How do you catch fish?


GH