Re: [exim] Re: no reply to STARTTLS

Kezdőlap
Üzenet törlése
Válasz az üzenetre
Szerző: W B Hacker
Dátum:  
Címzett: exim-users
Tárgy: Re: [exim] Re: no reply to STARTTLS
Sven Hartge wrote:

> Um 04:43 Uhr am 18.02.06 schrieb W B Hacker:
>
>
>>With fewer than ten servers running Exim, I cannot say for *sure*, but
>>with OpenSSL on FreeBSD this has never been an issue for us with Exim,
>>Qmail, Courier-MTA, DBMail, several IMAP/POP daemons, or anything else
>>that uses SSL/TLS/or SSH.
>
>
> *BSD behaves different than Linux > 2.6.11


For which I am eternally grateful!

Just lazy, I guess. ;-)

> so you are comparing apples and
> lemons.


No. Volume of juice.

AFAIK, *BSD and Linux *can* use either one.

Or both.

Not that they are equal in all respects.

Open or parts therof are a 'natural' for BSD, but I have from
time to time had GNUTLS alongside for apps that wanted it.

I'm agnostic.

> Also gnutls uses far more entropy than openssl.
>


Sounds advantageous, security-wise, on the face of it.
- Providing it doesn't break in some other way...

...as the OP seems to have found...

Bill