Torben Janssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to mark mails which has no reverse Lookup and are listed in
> an rbl.
>
> My acls look like this:
>
> warn message = X-DNSbl-Warning: $sender_host_address is listed in
> $dnslist_domain
> set acl_c1 = DNSbl-Warning
> dnslists = list.dsbl.org : \
> dnsbl.sorbs.net : \
> dnsbl.njabl.org : \
> bl.spamcop.net : \
> dsn.rfc-ignorant.org : \
> sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org : \
> l1.spews.dnsbl.sorbs.net
>
> warn message = X-rDNS: $sender_host_address has no rDNS
> set acl_c2 = rDNS
> !verify = reverse_host_lookup
>
> warn message = mailserver has no reverse lookup and is
> listed in a blacklist
> condition = ${if and { {eq
> {$acl_c1}{DNSbl-Warning}}{eq {$acl_c2}{rDNS}} } {yes}{no} }
>
> My experience shows me that acl_c1 and c2 are alway set. So my last
> condition is always true. First I tried to check if the two headers
> X-DNSbl-Warning and X-rDNS are present but the condition I created
> always fail...
Yes, the acl is executed in order. Your first one says "set $acl_c1
to DNSbl-Warning", then try the dns lists. You should move the set
to _after_ the dnslists statement.
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
