wow - this really has me confused. This shouldn't be happening for a
number of reasons. The router has this condition:
condition = ${if and {\
{match{$h_X-Spam:}{SPAM}}\
{def:h_X-Outscan:}\
}{yes}{no}}
First - your message is not labeled as spam. And - what's even stranger
- you should never hit the router that triggers that message. The
X-Outscan header is only used if the message is coming from two specific
IP addresses that I provide outgoing email scanning for. So unless this
was an account on one of United Email Systems domains and was labeled as
spam - this should not happen.
Makes me wonder if exim is losing track of something.
John W. Baxter wrote:
>On 10/13/05 8:07 AM, "Marc Perkel" <marc@???> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I'd like to do this verification:
>>
>>verify = reverse_host_lookup
>>
>>except I want it to fail only if the lookup returns no host but pass if
>>it is just misconfigured. Is there a way to do that?
>>
>>
>
>Marc, your spam filtering blocked my attempt to reply directly, so I'll use
>the list after all. The Bounce contains my answer near the bottom.
>
>This message was created automatically by mail delivery software at Junk
>Email Filter dot com. If this email was rejected in error, please let us
>know.
>
>The message from "John W. Baxter" <jwblist@???> was rejected by
>server newton.ctyme.com on Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:46 -0700
>
>A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients.
>
>The following address(es) failed:
>
> marc@???
> Sorry - you can't send spam from this server. Your spam has been
>intercepted and bocked!
>
>====== This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ======
>
>Return-path: <jwblist@???>
>Received: from entiat.olympus.net ([65.117.224.69])
> by newton.ctyme.com with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
> id 1EQ54X-0000ZR-9X
> for marc@???; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:45 -0700
>Received: from LoricaMail on entiat.olympus.net ([172.21.2.55]
>helo=entiat.olympus.net)
> by entiat.olympus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
> id 1EQ54T-0002nj-LY
> for marc@???; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:41 -0700
>Received: from fox.olympus.net ([65.117.226.74]:63778 helo=[172.27.38.5])
> by entiat.olympus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
> id 1EQ54D-0002lh-Tc
> for marc@???; Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:26 -0700
>User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.0.050811
>Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:32:24 -0700
>Subject: Re: [exim] verify = reverse_host_lookup - variation?
>From: "John W. Baxter" <jwblist@???>
>To: Marc Perkel <marc@???>
>Message-ID: <BF73CC18.8897%jwblist@???>
>Thread-Topic: [exim] verify = reverse_host_lookup - variation?
>Thread-Index: AcXQC08Wjca8njv+EdqVqwAwZfjYPg==
>In-Reply-To: <434E784B.8080501@???>
>Mime-version: 1.0
>Content-type: text/plain;
> charset="US-ASCII"
>Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
>X-Virtual-Service: OlympusNet
>X-Exim-Id: 1EQ54D-0002lh-Tc
>X-Olympus-MailID-CF: 1EQ54D-0002lh-TcOct13083226WWd
>X-Olympus-Virus: Scanned
>X-Olympus-OlympusNetMail: Initial processing complete
>X-Fingerprint: jwblist@???.117
>X-Spamfilter-host: newton.ctyme.com - http://www.junkemailfilter.com"
>X-Mail-from: jwblist@???
>X-Sender-Nameserver: dns1.olympus.net dca-ans-01.inet.qwest.net
>svl-and-01.inet.qwest.net mx1.olympus.net entiat.olympus.net
>X-Sender-host-address: 65.117.224.69
>X-Temp-Whitesubject: YES exim
>X-Temp-Whitephrase: YES exim
>X-Spamprobe: ham-super * 0.0000000 OK
>
>On 10/13/05 8:07 AM, "Marc Perkel" <marc@???> wrote:
>
>
>
>>I'd like to do this verification:
>>
>>verify = reverse_host_lookup
>>
>>except I want it to fail only if the lookup returns no host but pass if
>>it is just misconfigured. Is there a way to do that?
>>
>>
>
>We gave up trying to induce Exim to do lookups the way we wanted, and
>instead run a Python daemon to do them for us and return the sorts of
>results we want. We didn't like Exim's treatment of various forms of lookup
>error.
>
>Exim is essentially unchangeable in this regard at this point...too many
>existing configurations.
>
> --John
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Marc Perkel - marc@???
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
