On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Tony Finch wrote:
> Hmm, this turns out to be slightly more subtle than I thought.
>
> widen_domains is OK in a sender address if the current address is a child
> of the actual sender address, because in that case the address that is
> being widened doesn't appear in the message header. For example, if I send
> a message from tony.finch@??? and the following redirections
> occur, this should be permitted. This happens a lot in our current setup.
You going to fix the code?
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
