Thank you for the fast answer
it looks like the troubles come from
EXPERIMENTAL_SPF=yes
investigating deeper ...
Wolfgang
Philip Hazel <ph10@???> wrote on 08.09.2005 11:17:29:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2005 Wolfgang.Fuertbauer@??? wrote:
> > Nobody seams to care ...
> > can you help please
> I don't know. Normal compilation of Exim on Linux has no problems.
> > >gcc auth-spa.c
> > >auth-spa.c: In function `dumpRaw':
> > >auth-spa.c:1285: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> > >auth-spa.c: In function `unicodeToString':
> > >auth-spa.c:1299: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> > >gcc spa.c
> > >spa.c: In function `auth_spa_server':
> > >spa.c:186: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> > >ar cq auths.a
> > >ranlib auths.a
> > >make[2]: Leaving directory
> > `/usr/src/packages/BUILD/exim-4.52/build-Linux-i386/auths'
> >
> > >make[1]: *** No rule to make target `lookups/lookups.a', needed by
> > `exim'. Stop.
> Have you tried starting again from a clean copy of the distribution, and
> building with very minimal configuration? That is, set only the settings
> in Local/Makefile that are required. If that works, you can then add
> more and see what causes the problem.
> > SUPPORT_MAILDIR=yes
> > SUPPORT_MAILSTORE=yes
> > SUPPORT_MBX=yes
> Very few people need all 3 of those.
> > AUTH_CRAM_MD5=yes
> > AUTH_PLAINTEXT=yes
> > # AUTH_SPA=no
> That is odd. You had an error while compiling auth-spa.c, which should
> not happen unless you have AUTH_SPA=yes.
> > SUPPORT_MOVE_FROZEN_MESSAGES=yes
> I don't think anybody ever uses that ancient option any more!
> --
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
> Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Fuertbauer (e-Mail: Wolfgang.Fuertbauer@???)
EBEWE Pharma
Mondseestrasse 11
4866 Unterach, Austria
Tel +43 7665 8123 315
Fax +43 7665 8123 1487
http://www.ebewe.com
