Fred Viles wrote:
>On 31 Aug 2005 at 12:16, Marc Perkel wrote about
> "Re: [exim] Anti Phishing Trick - La":
>
>|...
>| What is invalid about it? I get no false positives at all.
>
>Didn't read any of the replies in the previous thread, I guess?
>
>To recap: Your assumption just isn't true. It may hold up for some
>specific cases (paypal/ebay), but you can't extrapolate from them to
>the world at large.
>
Not trying to extrapolate it to the world at large. But the list gets
the vast majority of them. The way I see it 90% or better reduction is a
good start.
>Lack of FPs for some period of time, even if true, also means
>nothing. It's most likely you simply haven't gotten any legitimate
>mail from many of your listed domains.
>
>
>
That's an interesting assumption. I'm filtering for 350 domains and no
complaints. My Wells Fargo email gets through just fine because it comes
from Wells Fargo servers and the paypal and ebay stuff just work. I have
the most accurate spam filter on the planet and this makes it even better.
--
Marc Perkel - marc@???
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
