Re: [exim] Making 'warn' errors fatal

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Fred Viles wrote:

> On 18 Jul 2005 at 12:59, Alan J. Flavell wrote about
> |
> | Use "defer" ("deny" would produce a 5xx rejection).
>
> It's not quite that simple, since Brian doesn't want to defer when
> the scanner *is* running.

That's true, yes. Sorry for over-simplifying.

I see that a genial solution has already been posted, so I'll say no
more.

thanks