On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Marc Sherman wrote:
>
> It might be a good idea to come up with a unique name for the message ID
> that exim uses internally. It's always seemed problematic to me that
> there are two distinct (but related) concepts both called message id. In
> at least one case ISTR someone being told to use $h_message-id: when
> they were trying to determine the internal ID of a message. I know that
> change would be a big job in the docs, but IMO it would be worth it to
> reduce confusion.
I think Sendmail uses the term "queue id". However changing Exim's term is
more than just a documentation problem, because of things like $message_id.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
