Re: [exim] Heads up?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: Alan J. Flavell
CC: Exim users list
Subject: Re: [exim] Heads up?
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Alan J. Flavell wrote:
>
> Thinking aloud: one way might be analogous to the HTTP 30x redirection
> response, which, instead of accepting the incoming traffic and then
> sending it onwards, would inform the offering MTA to re-send the mail
> to the new address. However, this then reveals the new address to the
> offering MTA, which would be undesirable in an abuse situation.


SMTP has a 551 response for this purpose, but nothing supports it.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}