On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 16:51 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:19:39 +0000 (GMT), Philip Hazel
> <ph10@???> wrote:
> >For myself, I consider the fact that Debian is still introducing new
> >users to Exim 3, three years after it was superseded, a Bad Thing for
> >those users, because there is nowhere that they can get good support any
> >more.
>
> I agree to this. However, _this_ is part of our release policy, and I
> am not in a position to change that. Our release cycles are _way_ too
> long.
Is there a way of having the sarge version of exim3 marked as (strongly)
deprecated - I'd prefer to go for getting it removed, but lets go for
realistic targets?
I presume existing debian users that just follow the standard upgrade
path will stay with exim3 or am I misreading things?
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
