On 17 Feb 2005 at 0:35, Piotr Roszatycki wrote about
"Re: [exim] auth_hack_outlook4 for E":
| On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Alan J. Flavell wrote:
|
| > On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
| >
| > > AFAIK, Philip Hazel rejected this patch for some anti-Microsoft reasons.
| >
| > Please present your evidence for this remarkable claim.
|
| Oh :(
|
| I'm sorry. It shouldn't so offensive as it was. I've just spent some time
| on searching Google and mailing list archives to find a solution for
| broken OE4.xx SMTP AUTH support. I've found an explanation of Philip Hazel
| and he was clear that he won't include such support in any case. I'll try
| to find the URL.
It's the "for some anti-Microsoft reasons" that needs to be
substantiated.
And, FWIW, exim 4.x *does* support such broken MUAs. No code patch
neeeded. Just add this to the end of your list of authenticators:
bogus:
driver = plaintext
public_name = "PRIVATE\n250-AUTH=LOGIN PLAIN"
server_prompts = User Name : Password
server_condition = no
- Fred
