Richard Clayton wrote:
> it's been picked up because SpamHaus released a press release on
> Thursday on this topic -- which has been picked up by various people,
> including BBC online who misunderstood considerably :( For Steve
> Linford's orginal words see:
>
> http://www.spamhaus.org/news.lasso?article=156
The media, always having to screwup correct information.
Isn't the real cause of spam because enough people respond to it to make it
profitable for the spammer? If that's true, be nice if these idiots would
ignore it so they'd get 0 responces and not spam anymore! (yea, I'm
dreaming...)
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
