Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond@???> spilled some coffee onto the keyboard, and the result happened to be:
> > Please make sure you get the final RPMs (4.44-0_28) and not the RC2 ones
> > (4.44_rc2-0_28) - the latter don't work properly and need removing but
> > unfortunately I'm not able to get rid of them right now.
> Only a suggestion to the naming scheme you used:
>
> package exim-perl-4.44_rc2-0_28.fc1 (which is newer than exim-perl-4.44-0_28.fc1) is already installed
> package exim-4.44_rc2-0_28.fc1 (which is newer than exim-4.44-0_28.fc1) is already installed
>
> It thinks the rc2 is newer, so namingscheme must be slightly different
> next time i guess for easy updating.
FWI: Adding the Epoch rpm variable would take care of this.
Most(all?) 'rpm's will compare the releases using
"epoch:version-release"
--
Bernt 'Burnie' Pettersen /// DoD#2345 NAF
<E-mail:burnie@???> /// <URL:http://burnie.sh/>
Well, actually I couldn't find a better signature here.....
