On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> Running 4.34, I saw an unexpected use of a low-priority MX between
> two of my systems. The server end of the connection logged it,
> but the client did not. Since the logged F= was a real name not
> "<>" I'm assuming this was a recipient verify callout.
>
> Is this likely and if so, is it a bug that the highest-priority MX
> was not used?
Without more information, it is impossible to say. For instance, was the
high priority server very busy at the time? Could it have rejected a
connection attempt?
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
