ph10 2005/01/04 11:28:17 GMT
Modified files:
exim-test-orig/AutoTest/log 598
exim-test-orig/AutoTest/mail 598.ph10
Log:
New release of SpamAssassin changed output from its test.
Revision Changes Path
1.5 +6 -6 exim/exim-test-orig/AutoTest/log/598
1.5 +55 -49 exim/exim-test-orig/AutoTest/mail/598.ph10
Index: 598
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test-orig/AutoTest/log/598,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- 598 29 Dec 2004 16:34:31 -0000 1.4
+++ 598 4 Jan 2005 11:28:17 -0000 1.5
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=986
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=1080
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 => ph10 <ph10@???> R=r1 T=t1
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaX-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=1125 id=41C2F849.3060203@???
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=1198 id=41C2F849.3060203@???
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 => ph10 <ph10@???> R=r1 T=t1
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaY-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=1466 id=abcde
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=1501 id=abcde
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 => ph10 <ph10@???> R=r1 T=t1
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmaZ-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=1241 id=41C2F849.3060203@???
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=1314 id=41C2F849.3060203@???
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 => ph10 <ph10@???> R=r1 T=t1
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbA-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=4389 id=20041217133501.GA3058@???
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local-esmtp S=4384 id=20041217133501.GA3058@???
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 => ph10 <ph10@???> R=r1 T=t1
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbB-0005vi-00 Completed
-1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbC-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local S=964
+1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbC-0005vi-00 <= ph10@??? U=ph10 P=local S=1058
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbC-0005vi-00 => ph10 <ph10@???> R=r1 T=t1
1999-03-02 09:44:33 10HmbC-0005vi-00 Completed
Index: 598.ph10
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-test-orig/AutoTest/mail/598.ph10,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.4 -r1.5
--- 598.ph10 29 Dec 2004 16:34:31 -0000 1.4
+++ 598.ph10 4 Jan 2005 11:28:17 -0000 1.5
@@ -6,20 +6,22 @@
Message-Id: <E10HmaX-0005vi-00@???>
From: Philip Hazel <ph10@???>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
-X-Spam_score: 0.9
-X-Spam_score_int: 9
+X-Spam_score: -0.7
+X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "xoanon.csi.cam.ac.uk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
- has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
+ has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
- Content preview: A message without any headers. [...]
- Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required)
+ Content preview: [...]
+ Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
- 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers
-X-Router-SSint: 9
+ 0.5 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers
+ -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
+ 1.6 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
+X-Router-SSint: -6
A message without any headers.
@@ -34,20 +36,21 @@
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
Message-ID: <41C2F849.3060203@???>
Sender: Philip Hazel <ph10@???>
-X-Spam_score: 1.2
-X-Spam_score_int: 12
-X-Spam_bar: +
+X-Spam_score: -1.7
+X-Spam_score_int: -16
+X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "xoanon.csi.cam.ac.uk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
- has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
+ has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: OK, this should look like a genuine message. [...]
- Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 5.0 required)
+ Content analysis details: (-1.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
- 1.2 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date
-X-Router-SSint: 12
+ 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date
+ -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
+X-Router-SSint: -16
OK, this should look like a genuine message.
@@ -62,27 +65,27 @@
Message-id: abcde
Sender: Philip Hazel <ph10@???>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
-X-is-spam: classified as spam
-X-Spam_score: 6.7
-X-Spam_score_int: 67
-X-Spam_bar: ++++++
+X-Spam_score: 1.9
+X-Spam_score_int: 19
+X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "xoanon.csi.cam.ac.uk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
- has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
+ has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: This should be enough to trip the threshold. [...]
- Content analysis details: (6.7 points, 5.0 required)
+ Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.3 FROM_HAS_MIXED_NUMS From: contains numbers mixed in with letters
- 0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
- 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers
- 1.6 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS From: starts with nums
- 0.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
- 1.8 INVALID_MSGID Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822
- 1.3 PLING_PLING Subject has lots of exclamation marks
-X-Router-SSint: 67
+ 0.2 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name
+ 0.5 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers
+ 1.5 FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS From: starts with nums
+ 0.4 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals
+ -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
+ 1.4 INVALID_MSGID Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822
+ 0.4 PLING_PLING Subject has lots of exclamation marks
+X-Router-SSint: 19
This should be enough to trip the threshold.
@@ -98,22 +101,23 @@
Message-ID: <41C2F849.3060203@???>
FakeReject: test fakereject
Sender: Philip Hazel <ph10@???>
-X-Spam_score: 1.2
-X-Spam_score_int: 12
-X-Spam_bar: +
+X-Spam_score: -1.7
+X-Spam_score_int: -16
+X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "xoanon.csi.cam.ac.uk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
- has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
+ has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: OK, this should look like a genuine message, but it
will trip on THIS REGEX. [...]
- Content analysis details: (1.2 points, 5.0 required)
+ Content analysis details: (-1.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
- 1.2 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date
+ 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date
+ -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
X-Regex: Regex matched
-X-Router-SSint: 12
+X-Router-SSint: -16
OK, this should look like a genuine message, but
it will trip on THIS REGEX.
@@ -188,12 +192,12 @@
X-3-is-rfc822: 0
X-3-decode-filename: /source/exim4/AutoTest/spool/scan/10HmbB-0005vi-00/10HmbB-0005vi-00-00003
X-3-content-size: 1
-X-Spam_score: 2.3
-X-Spam_score_int: 23
-X-Spam_bar: ++
+X-Spam_score: -1.7
+X-Spam_score_int: -16
+X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "xoanon.csi.cam.ac.uk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
- has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
+ has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: There was a part of the patch missing, complete one is
@@ -205,12 +209,12 @@
$$m_data{$key}); } else { - $chartotherval += $$m_count{$key}; +
$chartotherval += $$m_data{$key}; } } push(@chartdatanames, "Other");
[...]
- Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 5.0 required)
+ Content analysis details: (-1.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
- 1.2 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date
- 1.1 NO_DNS_FOR_FROM Domain in From header has no MX or A DNS records
-X-Router-SSint: 23
+ 1.1 DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date
+ -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
+X-Router-SSint: -16
--T4sUOijqQbZv57TR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
@@ -258,20 +262,22 @@
Message-Id: <E10HmbC-0005vi-00@???>
From: Philip Hazel <ph10@???>
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
-X-Spam_score: 0.9
-X-Spam_score_int: 9
+X-Spam_score: -0.7
+X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "xoanon.csi.cam.ac.uk", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
- has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
+ has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
- Content preview: A message without any headers. [...]
- Content analysis details: (0.9 points, 5.0 required)
+ Content preview: [...]
+ Content analysis details: (-0.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
- 0.9 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers
-X-Router-SSint: 9
+ 0.5 FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS From: ends in numbers
+ -2.8 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
+ 1.6 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
+X-Router-SSint: -6
A message without any headers.
