Re: [exim-dev] Standardizing the Exim documentation

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M++\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMMMNigel Metheringham at <-
.MNigel Metheringham at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Nico Erfurth
Date:  
To: Nigel Metheringham
CC: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Standardizing the Exim documentation
Nigel Metheringham wrote:

> However I could well be convinced at present to stay with SGCAL format
> and write stuff to spit out docbook/xml or some other good intermediate
> format.

The question is, how does SGCAL look like? Is it really that complex?

Nico


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-dev
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [exim-dev] Standardizing the Exim documentationRe: [exim-dev] Standardizing the Exim documentation->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)