Thanks for the advice, I did wonder if this might be the case, I'm
afraid I do need to bounce messages though, my spam filter sometimes
identifies mails as spam when they are genuine, in this case the
sender needs to know there is a problem.
Most spam messages have false addresses anyway, it's usually virus
infected mails that sometimes have forged addresses in and I don't
bounce those messages.
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:27:19 +0100, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@???> wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 14:18 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > If you really insist on
> > sending out reject messages please can you tune them so that Tim
> > Jackson's (another member of this list) excellent filter to detect and
> > destroy such warnings needs to know about your reject messages. Check
> > they are caught by this filter and if not let Tim have samples so the
> > rest of us can ignore them...
>
> Nah. If you really insist on sending out reject messages, then why not
> just save time and just call your ISP's abuse desk and get them to
> disconnect you -- before anyone else objects to your backscatter spam
> and calls the ISP to complain :)
>
> --
> dwmw2
>
>
