On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 13:13 +0400, Peter Savitch wrote: > In such a nice datacenter produced by Suresh the main drawback becomes a
> minor one: if a cluster member goes down, it takes down it's (small)
> queue: this condition I actually meant by drawback. The smaller queue
> means fewer problems.
if a cluster member goes down, a different cluster member will assume
its role and mount the its disk(s) from the SAN.
