On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:08:57 +0100 (BST) "Alan J. Flavell" <a.flavell@???> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004, Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
> > Also, FC makes it easy to keep things updated.
> Only as long as the release is current (+/- half a year or so). If
> you're to stay with the programme (as opposed to doing your own
> support single-handed for a discontinued release) then you'd need a
> re-install 2 or 3 times a year.
> But this is the wrong place for OS advocacy, so I'll try to shut up
> now.
i concur, _but_,
i am running fc1 and fc2 systems side by side, and both releases
are currently being maintained by the fedora project. critical
updates are beingannounced for both, simultaneously.
fedoralegacy.org is even supplying updates for rh 8 and 9, and
when the main fedora project drops fc1, i would anticipate that
fedoralegacy will pick it up.
so i don't think your representation is 100% accurate.
richard
--
Richard Welty rwelty@???
Averill Park Networking 518-573-7592
Java, PHP, PostgreSQL, Unix, Linux, IP Network Engineering, Security
