On 2004-07-16 Tom Kistner <tom@???> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> >I wonder whether it would not be better to beat the patch autors
> >repeatedly on the head to force them to unify their interface before
> >giving one of them semi-official status by including it in exiscan.
I forgot to mention that the libsrs2-patch is based on the -alt patch.
> I chose -alt because -non-alt wanted me to look at a patch for qmail
> to learn about the API. *YUKK*
;-)
>> (I do not like the fact that libsrs_alt requires OpenSSL to
>> compile)
> I guess it only uses some hashing algorithms, maybe they can be
> implemented natively in the future.
ametzler@downhill:/tmp/libsrs_alt-0.3$ grep -ri openssl src
src/hash.h:#include <openssl/hmac.h>
src/hash.h:#include <openssl/evp.h>
src/srs_alt.c: // Use OpenSSL HMAC to perform hash
exim includes native HMAC sha1 routines, perhaps they could be
grabbed.
cu andreas
--
"See, I told you they'd listen to Reason," [SPOILER] Svfurlr fnlf,
fuhggvat qbja gur juveyvat tha.
Neal Stephenson in "Snow Crash"
