On Fri, 7 May 2004, Andy Fletcher wrote:
> If so, what is the likelihood of this changing, by either way
> I suggested or alternatives - there are a lot of broken mailservers
> out there (by design or mistake) which reject a null MAIL TO but which
> you'd rather accept mail from than bounce unconditionally just because
> of this reason.
There is no likelihood of my changing this. Quite apart from views on
what a callout is supposed to achieve, I think the danger of callout
loops is too great. (Sure, you can come up with rules that minimize
this, but it's getting too complicated for comfort.)
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
