On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 19:19, Andrew - Supernews wrote:
> > >>>>> "Nigel" == Nigel Metheringham <Nigel.Metheringham@???> writes:
> >
> > Nigel> I've seen a good few of those myself recently...
> >
> > Nigel> The message is given when an incoming SMTP session sends a
> > Nigel> command before the initial 220 SMTP greeting has been issued.
> >
> > It also seems to be given, I've now found, when the remote end just
> > hangs up the connection before the greeting even if it doesn't
> > actually send the QUIT first.
I'm a bit surprised at that, but I'll check it out.
> Philip,
>
> Would you care to attempt to differentiate these cases in the logged
> info, and maybe report the command that was sent in error.
>
> [One for the wishlist :-) ]
Noted.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
