Re: [Exim] Temporary defer on callouts

Alan J. Flavell said:
> By the way, a possibly dumb question: can a spamassassin recipe
> actually distinguish whether it's dealing with a bounce or with a
> non-null envelope sender? One of the problems, where virus warnings
> aren't evident from the Subject header but only in the body of the
> report, is that we run the risk of spamassassin stifling any attempt
> to discuss the warnings or their SA recipes, believing the discussion
> to be a bogus virus alert ;-))

You could create a header that you could then key on that indicates the
message has a null envelope sender.