--
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 03:40, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
> At 23:31 -0700 2003/09/25, Vineet Kumar wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2003-09-25 at 14:48, George Szekely wrote:
> > > > Dear List:
> >> >
> >> > fakereject was the perfect solution for notifying a sender that .exe
> >> > is not acceptable (any file must be zipped).
> >> >
> > > > It only sent back a custom 550 ... without the attachement.
> [...]
> >Does a 5xx really do this? I understand that generating a bounce
> >message does, but as I understand it, a 5xx is really the way to go. In
> [...]
> the point Greg was making referred to George's original post in which
> he said that he *sent* back a "custom 550 ... without the attachement
> [sic]". That was either unclear or was not an SMTP response, that is
> it was a bounce.
> 5XX at SMTP is fine.
Thank you Giuliano... that is exactly what I meant when I
*cough*over*cough* reacted ...
To be honest, I'd rather get 20 offers a day to split US $41,500,000
(Forty One Million, Five Hundred Thousand US Dollars) with a chance to
get a new bride (with a Mustache and Bandoleer) then get ANY of this
current cruft.
But things being as they may... fine with the 5xx @ SMTP is indeed fine
with me as well.
--
greg, greg@???
REMEMBER ED CURRY!
http://www.iwethey.org/ed_curry
Vos lobes d'orreilles sont comme les tetes des poissons en hiver.
--
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[ signature.asc of type application/pgp-signature deleted ]
--
