(do we see a pattern developing here? Looks like the real blame lies
with the software they're using, no?)
> I generally point out that further instances of this abuse will be
> considered a deliberate denial-of-service attack and will be treated
> accordingly.
I'm sure that'll have the US army quaking in their boots, along with
Mailsweeper@??? , JENSVirusCheckService@??? and a couple of
dozen more that went into our blacklist (including a fair-sized batch
of postmaster@... addresses which appeared as envelope-sender).
So yes, I'm sure we'd all agree on the principle, but sometimes it's a
bit hard to put it into practice.
