On 31 Jul 2003, Scott Dexter wrote:
> I tried doing this, but it complains that an instance of exim is already
> and bound to port 25.
A: No.
Q: Should I put the quotes below my answers?
Are you sure you included the "-oX 465", which binds that instance of exim to
port 465 (the "standard" "smtps" port)?
-- Daniel
> On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 10:43, Hr. Daniel Mikkelsen wrote:
> > On 31 Jul 2003, Scott Dexter wrote:
> >
> > > Jul 31 10:34:21 mailsrv exim[13888]: 2003-07-31 10:34:21 SMTP protocol
> > > violation: synchronization error (next input sent too soon): rejected
> > > "\200F^A^C" H=dmz.prov.ingenta.com [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
> >
> > This is probably Evolution expecting "TLS at once", an stunnel to port 25 or
> > something. I run a separate Exim instance to cover this:
> >
> > exim -bd -oX 465 -tls-on-connect
> >
> > -- Daniel
> --
> Scott Dexter
> Jr Unix Administrator
> Ingenta, Inc.
> 111R Chestnut Street, Providence, RI 02903
> T +1.401.331.2014
> F +1.401.331.2015
> E scott.dexter@???
> AIM scottder517
>
>
> --
>
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
