On Fri, 2003-05-16 at 19:43, Matt Jones wrote:
> Then after a second or so I see this in the /log/syslog:
>
> <date> <servername> mailscanner[processID]: Scanning 1 message, XXX
> bytes
> <date> <servername> mailscanner[processID]: Scanned 1 message, XXX bytes
> in 0 seconds
> <date> <servername> exim[processID]: <date> 19Gjvw5....-00 =>
> <firstTO:recipient> D=procmail T=procmail_pipe.
Your scanning setup is broken - either you are pushing multiple
recipients down a pipe and only passing one address, or its
(mis)reading the addresses from the headers.
Its starting to appear that the major problem in mail configuration is
that people are making a complete hash of adding in content scanning
systems - to the point where the majority of these systems appear to
lose mail under some circumstances (and some appear to lose *lots* of
mail). Not to mention the number of odd bounces I see from content
scanners on the mailing list - just mentioning viagra has probably
prevented this message getting to a good percentage :-)
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
