On Fri, 09 May 2003 12:35:34 -0700, Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
>Ralf G. R. Bergs wrote:
>
>>>>>> deny domains = +local_domains
>>>>>> !domains = EXIM_VIRT_DOM_DIR/no_callout
>>>>>> !verify = sender/callout=20s/check_postmaster
>
>>>>>
>>>>> deny domains = !EXIM_VIRT_DOM_DIR/no_callout : +local_domains
>>>>> !verify = sender/callout=20s/check_postmaster
>>>>
>>
>> Well, can you then please explain me why MY version (the first version
quoted
>> above) actually works?
>>
>
>Both methods will work just fine. In fact, I prefer your first option,
because
>it's clearer what's happening. Here is why your first version works:
In fact I *know* why my version works, otherwise I probably couldn't have come
up with that implementation. My question was just rhetorical. :-)
>These two methods are equally valid, and I don't see that there's any
particular
>advantage to option #2; in fact, option #2 has the "hidden" requirement that
it
>must be done in exactly the order listed, whereas in option #1 the two
"domains"
>checks could be reversed with no ill effects.
Right, and this I why I also prefer my version. :-)
Thanks everyone who participated for your comments.
--
L I N U X .~.
The Choice /V\
of a GNU /( )\
Generation ^^-^^
