At 0:33 +0100 2003/03/11, Mark Bergsma wrote: >Giuliano Gavazzi wrote:
>>At 9:55 +0000 2003/03/10, Philip Hazel wrote:
>>>True, but see also the cannot_route_message option (currently documented
>>>only in NewStuff).
>
>>Ah, this is simpler than my suggestion of adding an "Unknown user"
>>router at the end (that, by the way, works).
>
>That depends. It doesn't work for my setup, because cannot_route_message
>is only set by routers that are actually run (but decline), and most of
>my routers are skipped because of precondition tests (like
>'check_local_user', 'domains' and 'condition').
sorry, but what does not work for your setup? The
cannot_route_message option or a last always-failing router like I
suggested?
>After having used Exim for about 4 years now I only recently discovered
>that routers 'declining' and 'skipping because of a failing
>precondition' are not the same. :S
