On 2002-05-09 at 14:12 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>>>> "PP" == Phil Pennock <Phil.Pennock@???> writes:
> PP> A pre-built binary RPM from someone I can trust is _ideal_ for
> PP> such a situation.
>
> What reason do you have to trust me?
None. I do trust Nigel, which is why I mentioned that.
I was stating general principles, pointing out that there are uses for a
binary and disputing your sweeping claim that anyone who isn't in a
position to do things the long way around has a big problem.
> Nope, I'm just being practical. If you want to use it, you're going
> to have to hack it because the options I needed when building the
> package are not the options you will need when building your package.
> (And it isn't the best package in the world anyway, but I've said that
> already.) And I simply don't have the time to hack it for you.
I'm not asking you to. I did not ask you to. I did point out a flaw in
your argument.
Please don't mis-represent what someone else has said; if someone has
publically disagreed with you then you do not have the right to put
words in their mouth.
--
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
