Re: [Exim] Re: closed connection in response to STARTTLS.

On 2002-04-24 at 22:58 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> IOW, I think the semantics of the hosts_nopass_tls option need reversing -
> we should explicitly list the hosts which _will_ accept this behaviour,
> rather than the hosts which won't. Would you accept that?

If using Exim 4 (which you are, for hosts_nopass_tls) then read section
10 of the spec.

Note the ability to negate.
--
Can you see a vampire through a one-way mirror?
<http://www.nukees.com/d/19971112.html>