Be careful with pointers into Cisco documentation - their site structure
changes frequently. BTW their search engine is useless as well.. Sign..
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, John W Baxter wrote:
> The FAQ indeed would be a good spot. The FAQ item should include the fact
> (if it is a fact) that PIX's attempt to sanitize email by blocking ESMPT
> stuff can be turned off...and a pointer into Cisco's documentation on the
> subject.
>
> --John
>
> At 14:01 +0000 9/4/2001, Richard rebel wrote:
> >God, do I feel silly. I spent about 1.5 hours digging through exim's
> >innards looking for a reason for this...
> >
> >Whomever the faq maintainer is, this might be something usefull to put in.
> >
> >Thanks!
> >
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >
> >Richard F. Rebel
> >
> >........................................................................
> >
> >On Thu, 30 Aug 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >
> >> +++ Richard rebel [exim-users] <30/08/01 17:46 +0000>:
> >> > Exim 3.32 on Solaris 2.6 host seems to be responding to my Linux hosts
> >> > [root@bertha etc]# telnet ims.corp.fortunecity.com 25
> >> > Connected to ims.corp.fortunecity.com.
> >> > 220
> >>***************************************2**********0****200*********2**0*00
> >>
> >> This is the sign of a Cisco Pix "Mailguard" sitting in front of your MTA
> >>
> >> > Also, it does NOT understand EHLO's???? Thus we never get TLS sessions.
> >>
> >> Pix breaks ESMTP and only does SMTP. It is a nuisance when you have a
> >>secure
> >> MTA running on your box.
> >>
> >> "no fixup protocol smtp 25" should do the trick I think ...
> >>
> >> -suresh
> >> --
> >> Suresh Ramasubramanian <----> mallet <at> efn dot org
> >> EMail Sturmbannfuhrer, Lower Middle Class Unix Sysadmin
> >>
> >> --
> >> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
> >>details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim
> >details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
>
>
--
