Re: [Exim] local_domains vs. hold_domains

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
M\the complete thread tree sorted by date
MMFrank Elsner at <-
Philip Hazel at ->
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tamas TEVESZ
Date:  
To: Frank Elsner
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [Exim] local_domains vs. hold_domains
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Frank Elsner wrote:

i _think_ that (and this is emphasized)

> search_tidyup called

this is the end of the routing phase

> It seems that "hold_domains" isn't honoured.

hold_domains affects the transport.

imho. and this might very well be wrong.

--
[-]



This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
Exim-users
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-[Exim] local_domains vs. hold_domainsRe: [Exim] ETRN again...->
Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrated by cumin AdminsLurker (version 2.3)