Quoth Sheldon Hearn on Tue, Jun 19, 2001:
> Personally, no. You're talking about what I think is a cosmetic header,
> and as such, meaningless to the MTA.
I don't know whether you can define it as "cosmetic" (it *is*
useful), but I don't think rejecting on the basis of Date:
header's contents is useful. I often get mail on mailing list
claiming to be sent a couple of years before or after it was
received.
Useless info: on BSD systems you can't set date back in
multi-user mode (for pedants: yes, it depends on the kernel
security mode).
> PS: Remember that many of the answers you receive to your questions here
> are from users and not the author.
Disclaimers, eh?
Vadik.
--
To err is human, to moo bovine.
