On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 11:15:16PM +0530,
Suresh Ramasubramanian <mallet@???> is thought to have said:
> Philip Hazel [Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 05:17:22PM +0000]:
>
> > On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> > > Frank Elsner [Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 04:58:58PM +0100]:
> > > > An idea which came up when customizing prohibition messages:
> > > > It might be useful to have
> > > > $rbl_name containig the RBL name
> > > > available besides $rbl_domain and $rbl_text.
>
> > > Nice idea - only, the rbl_text (which returns the TXT record) generally
> > > contains a URL pointer like http://www.mail-abuse.org/[rbl/rss/dul] which
> > > makes it rather clear _which_ blacklist the connecting server is listed on.
>
> > It must have been a long day. I'm being thick. What do you want in
> > $rbl_name that is different to $rbl_domain? If you have $rbl_domain set
> > to rbl.maps.vix.com (say), what else do you want? I don't get it...
>
> Nope - I dont want the option, for the reason I pointed out above. Frank
> Eisner (above) likely rejects mail based on multiple blackhole lists (rbl,
> rss, dul, orbs, whatever) and wants his logs to show which blackhole list
> bounced which mail.
But they already do? My rejectlog and mainlog contains lines like:
2001-02-21 00:05:23 recipients refused from [211.58.255.108] (RBL
relays.mail-abuse.org)
Tabor
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Tabor J. Wells twells@???
Fsck It! Just another victim of the ambient morality
