> > Could the 'Secondary queue' suggestion be extended to improve Exim's > > handling of mail for dial-up hosts.
>
> Same reaction - I want to keep Exim clean and simple. I don't like
> complicated multi-level queueing schemes.
Well, we have fallback_hosts, but a fallback_queue would really help a
lot. That way yet unprocessed queued messages would be delivered first
and those that are deferred later. It would eliminate manual operation
after load peaks.
