> On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
>
> > That would work, but the question remains as to why Exim isn't picking
up
> > the 520 in response to its ehlo.
>
> Do we know for sure that it isn't? Nobody has posted an SMTP session
> transcript yet that shows this. I have just tried a test with one of my
> test programs. I think I sent back "502 " in response to EHLO, and
> Exim duly tried HELO.
>
From recollection of testing by hand, after the "502 " it was broken, as
in "stuck broken" and wouldn't correclty recognise a HELO or even an
RSET :-((
> --
> Philip
Mike
