> Then look at verify.c (the only matching file) and find:
>
> case FAIL:
> if (headers_checks_fail)
> {
> *errcode = 550;
> *errmess = (verify_address_parse_error == NULL)?
> string_sprintf("there is no valid sender in any header line "
> "(envelope sender is <%.1024s>)", sender_address) :
> string_sprintf("%s (envelope sender is <%.1024s>)",
> verify_address_parse_error,
> sender_address);
> return FALSE;
> }
>
> Looks very much like a 550 to me. Is there some kind of proxy in the
> way?
No, there's an admin in the way who sent me a session transcript with an entirely
different error that is clearly temporary and has nothing to do with the actual
problem we are trying to solve.
I guess I am guilty of not trusting the source. It won't happen again anytime soon. ;)
Michael
