Re: [Exim] message_body efficiency hack

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Sheldon Hearn
Date:  
To: Nigel Metheringham
CC: Exim
Subject: Re: [Exim] message_body efficiency hack

On Fri, 05 May 2000 14:27:51 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:

> I am proposing the following change to the implementation of
> message_body and message_body_end (this will not affect its use, just
> the internals):-


Are you proposing to impliment this as optional behaviour or will
everyone have to pay the performance penalty regardless of whether they
need this new functionality?

I'm in favour of this if administrators can choose to maintain the old
behaviour.

Ciao,
Sheldon.